Tapp Law Firm
Free Consultation: 501-623-9800
Menu Contact

Are pot breathalyzers accurate?

The introduction and initial applications of the breathalyzer brought controversy and confusion. Dating back to the 1930s, the device in its early stages left more questions than answers over its accuracy and the appropriate legal limits that would reveal a driver's intoxication. 

Previously a police officer's first-hand testimony would carry weight to determine the commission of a crime. Trusting a device over a seasoned law enforcement professional seemed unlikely. In spite of technological advances, the modern-day breathalyzer remains controversial. The results can mean the difference between guilt and innocence. 

The Search For Legal THC Limits

The state-by-state legalization of marijuana -- currently numbering 33 and the District of Columbia -- has spurred efforts to deal with the inevitable crimes associated with its use, particularly for those who drive after using the drug. 

In response, researchers at the University of Pittsburgh have created a prototype breathalyzer device that can supposedly determine THC levels in a driver. Like the early days of its alcohol testing predecessor, verifying the effectiveness and accuracy could take years, if not decades. 

Proving intoxication by alcohol requires measuring the amount in a person's blood, resulting in a "blood to breath" or "partition" ration with relative accuracy. Some claim a correlation is lacking when it comes to determining the amount of THC in a suspect's breath, not to mention the level of the driver's impairment. 

Numerous Challenges Ahead

Establishing the benchmark for impairment caused by marijuana remains unknown. History shows that decades went by before the court system could hash out a nationally accepted blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit, currently at .08. Regardless of the percentage and the length of time it has been in existence, scientists remain divided. 

Even today, they cannot agree on the legal drunk-driving limit with many believing that the number is arbitrary and lacks any form of "hard science." 

If history is any indication, standard THC testing has a long way to go beyond a police officer's visual and olfactory testing to determine criminal activity. 





No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Whether you need guidance through divorce, a personal injury lawsuit or any other of our practice areas, we encourage you to contact our office as soon as possible: 501-623-9800

msg iconEmail Us For a Response

Let Us Know Your Legal Need

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Tapp law Firm
Tapp law Firm

Tapp Law Firm | 424 Ouachita Avenue | Hot Springs, AR 71901 | Hot Springs Law Office Map

Tapp law Firm